Backcountry
03-05-2006, 05:50 PM
The blowout in the JHO store right now is unbelievable... I am seriously thinking about getting this pack...
...but, I've never tried one on and don't know how the fit will be. From the picture it doesn't look like the torso length is adjustable (is it?)... I'm 6'1" and my current pack is extremely comfortable, and while it hauls big, heavy loads quite well, it is a "backpacking" backpack and not a "backpack-hunting" backpack.
That said, the Badlands 4500 is very similar to my Mountainsmith Spectre which is about a 500 c.u. pack, internal frame, very well padded, etc...
Honestly, the only thing my current pack is not set up to do well is haul meat... the meat has to go inside the pack, and that makes for a nice mess. The only reason I'm cinsidering upgrading packs is to have a pack that is better suited to hauling meat... the Badlands 4500 claims to have an "integrated meat shelf", but there are no pictures of what that might actually look like, so I have no clue if it will work well.
I'm also interested in the Cabelas frame packs, but only the lightest models available... Cabelas has one that is listed at 12 pounds, which is ludicrous... my Mountainsmith weighs 4 lbs on the button, and is bombproof (It's got over 1000 miles and many moons and not a single tear or other problem).
If I buy the Badlands 4500, it has to be because the extra 3 lbs (it's listed as a 7.4 lb pack) in "features" somehow makes it a better pack than my already damn good Mountainsmith pack.
Anyway, if anybody can provide some details, likes, dislikes, comparisons, etc... I'd appreciate it!
Backcountry http://www.jesseshunting.com/forums/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/archer.gif
p.s. Here's a pic of me in the Mokelumne Wilderness this past August using the Mountainsmith pack.
http://www.jesseshunting.com/photopost/data/511/13239me-packing_sm.jpg
...but, I've never tried one on and don't know how the fit will be. From the picture it doesn't look like the torso length is adjustable (is it?)... I'm 6'1" and my current pack is extremely comfortable, and while it hauls big, heavy loads quite well, it is a "backpacking" backpack and not a "backpack-hunting" backpack.
That said, the Badlands 4500 is very similar to my Mountainsmith Spectre which is about a 500 c.u. pack, internal frame, very well padded, etc...
Honestly, the only thing my current pack is not set up to do well is haul meat... the meat has to go inside the pack, and that makes for a nice mess. The only reason I'm cinsidering upgrading packs is to have a pack that is better suited to hauling meat... the Badlands 4500 claims to have an "integrated meat shelf", but there are no pictures of what that might actually look like, so I have no clue if it will work well.
I'm also interested in the Cabelas frame packs, but only the lightest models available... Cabelas has one that is listed at 12 pounds, which is ludicrous... my Mountainsmith weighs 4 lbs on the button, and is bombproof (It's got over 1000 miles and many moons and not a single tear or other problem).
If I buy the Badlands 4500, it has to be because the extra 3 lbs (it's listed as a 7.4 lb pack) in "features" somehow makes it a better pack than my already damn good Mountainsmith pack.
Anyway, if anybody can provide some details, likes, dislikes, comparisons, etc... I'd appreciate it!
Backcountry http://www.jesseshunting.com/forums/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/archer.gif
p.s. Here's a pic of me in the Mokelumne Wilderness this past August using the Mountainsmith pack.
http://www.jesseshunting.com/photopost/data/511/13239me-packing_sm.jpg