Welby
03-12-2001, 09:25 PM
Jesse, great job on this website! ###Way to go.
Against the advice of elders (you know who you are ) I decided to tear into an older version of the Canon Sure Shot Owl AF/Date model, the all black version, to see if it could be "hotwired" for a trail cam. ###Indeed it can be, I am proud to say. ###See there, you can teach an old dog a new trick.
After pilfering with the camera for a while (and accidentally touching Mr. Charged Flash Capacitor - get this- FOUR TIMES!!!) I figured out where the contact points are to solder in the relay leads. ###It's not much different from the slightly newer model Owl AF that we have been using. ###
Where there are four little solder lines at the front of the newer AF, on the older AF there are five. ###The first is film rewind, the second auto focus, the third fire, the fourth ground, and the last is the ten second delay picture taker. ### As on the newer AF, solder a jumper between pins two and three, and then attach your relay leads to pins one and four.
Please note that I just discovered this today and that there have been NO FIELD TESTS of this model as of yet by me. ###Additionally, just for the record I am not professing to be the first to "hotwire" this camera, just that it was recommended to me not to use this camera but with no explanation as to why. ###So, I assumed no one else has been using this camera.
With the newer Owl AF fading away and rumours of a soon to be demise of the Owl PF, it is at least comforting to know that there are these older Owls there that can be used. ###With their age, it should be possible to acquire them for less than what we are used to paying for the newer cameras.
BTW, the older AF is a little difficult to get apart. ###Just take your time and pry gently, but really, really firmly...and don't be tempted pick up that sledgehammer in the corner over there. ###Old dogs don't take abuse very well, you know.
NOTE: ###I have edited this text from what I originally posted. ###Originally, I had listed the pins as different from what they actually are. ###This has been corrected. ###See discussion below.
(Edited by Welby at 3:34 pm on Mar. 20, 2001)
Against the advice of elders (you know who you are ) I decided to tear into an older version of the Canon Sure Shot Owl AF/Date model, the all black version, to see if it could be "hotwired" for a trail cam. ###Indeed it can be, I am proud to say. ###See there, you can teach an old dog a new trick.
After pilfering with the camera for a while (and accidentally touching Mr. Charged Flash Capacitor - get this- FOUR TIMES!!!) I figured out where the contact points are to solder in the relay leads. ###It's not much different from the slightly newer model Owl AF that we have been using. ###
Where there are four little solder lines at the front of the newer AF, on the older AF there are five. ###The first is film rewind, the second auto focus, the third fire, the fourth ground, and the last is the ten second delay picture taker. ### As on the newer AF, solder a jumper between pins two and three, and then attach your relay leads to pins one and four.
Please note that I just discovered this today and that there have been NO FIELD TESTS of this model as of yet by me. ###Additionally, just for the record I am not professing to be the first to "hotwire" this camera, just that it was recommended to me not to use this camera but with no explanation as to why. ###So, I assumed no one else has been using this camera.
With the newer Owl AF fading away and rumours of a soon to be demise of the Owl PF, it is at least comforting to know that there are these older Owls there that can be used. ###With their age, it should be possible to acquire them for less than what we are used to paying for the newer cameras.
BTW, the older AF is a little difficult to get apart. ###Just take your time and pry gently, but really, really firmly...and don't be tempted pick up that sledgehammer in the corner over there. ###Old dogs don't take abuse very well, you know.
NOTE: ###I have edited this text from what I originally posted. ###Originally, I had listed the pins as different from what they actually are. ###This has been corrected. ###See discussion below.
(Edited by Welby at 3:34 pm on Mar. 20, 2001)