View Full Version : weaver grand slam scopes
05-21-2003, 12:34 AM
What do you think of them? I am looking at getting on for my new 270wsm and I have read nothing but good things about this scope. My other thoughts where a bushnell elite 4200, which I already have and like, or a Nikon Monarch. What do you think of these scopes?
After having real bad luck with one Bushnell scope and one set of Bushnell binoc's, I would be real hesitant to buy more.
My buddy runs a Nikon on his 7mm mag and that thing stays zeroed year after year, and has some killer glass.
05-21-2003, 07:53 AM
They have the best reputation for reliable tracking of any scope out there.Tough decision,the elites have great optics and rainguard that can make damp weather hunting a lot easier.Nikons have great optics and light weight but they've always been a little to eye position critical for my taste.
05-21-2003, 12:28 PM
I have to agree with new Weaver Grand Slams are outstanding. Great scope the is very clear and bright. I honestly would ranking it higher than the Leupolds.
05-21-2003, 06:24 PM
I've got a 6x20 and I'm very please with it. I plan on
getting another one, hopefully soon. http://www.jesseshunting.com/forums/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cross-fingers.gif
I have a 3x10 Weaver Grand Slam on my Model 70 Classic Featherweight 22-250. Although I have only shot paper I really like it. The windage and elevation adjustments are nice and crisp. And it looks great.
03-05-2004, 11:09 AM
I was wondering about the Grand slam as well. I do mostly whitetail deer hunting and hunt with a Winchester m70 300wsm. Any thoughts on it and its performance in low light conditions?
03-05-2004, 07:40 PM
Woodseye, what were you referring to when you said the Nikon is a little too eye position critical for you? Would you expand on that?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.7 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.