View Full Version : High Brass v. Low Brass
Qbn Hunter
02-23-2003, 02:54 PM
I have always heard that high base is more potent than low base. If this is true why is that? If you compare a high brase 12 gauge #6 it has the same specs as a low base #6. Whats the deal here?
Speckmisser
02-24-2003, 07:44 AM
QBN,
It used to be that the High-brass shells were a higher velocity round, probably because they were loaded with more powder. I don't know for sure, but I'd bet this is a throwback to the old blackpowder loads and paper shells, though, because most reloaders will tell you that you don't need high brass for heavy loads anymore. A lot of guys are loading AAA empties with hi-velocity duck loads.
Anyway, I haven't bought small game ammo in ages, so I don't know if there is still a difference or not.
WildBird
02-24-2003, 09:04 AM
I think that now the high brass is used in factory ammo only to change their appearance from target loads. For instance #6 shot size and larger and heavier shot load. For instance, my factory Remington Express pheasant shells in 20 gauge are a 1oz load of #4 and are rated at 2 3/4 dram and have high brass. The factory #6 I bought this season are also high brass. Makes it easy to tell them apart in your vest. Speck is correct about low brass hulls being fine for heavy reloads, I use them all the time. WB
shufigo
02-24-2003, 09:50 AM
Purely marketing. Bigger = Better = more powerful = improved = shoots further = kills more = makes up for your lousy shooting etc, etc. As long as you spend a couple extra bucks, you've made 'em happy. Bottom line is that you can load target loads into hi brass hulls and max hunting loads into low brass hulls.
Qbn Hunter
02-24-2003, 09:29 PM
Is spending $6.00 more on a box of #6 3in. shells worth it, for wild pheasants? At Wal-Mart they are selling some #6 shots 2 3/4 inch shells for $4.67 a box. Is that enough to knock down pheasants?
WildBird
02-25-2003, 12:01 AM
Qbn -
The Walmart $4.67 ammo (Federal) is good for the $. Never had any bad Federal anything. I use it in 20 gauge for quail. I would upgrade for pheasant, like Remington Express for about $7. Then there is the plated shot stuff in #5 that stones em for more $. I would get the best you can afford. WB http://www.jesseshunting.com/forums/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smiley-faces-toast-beers.gif
DKScott
02-25-2003, 10:35 AM
High brass/low brass thing is over, especially once Activ came out with their no-brass loads. The plated shot in high velocity loads is the way to go - less shot deformation and better penetration. I always have 3" loads but I never use them. A couple times I should have. Then again, my shots at wild pheasant have been limited for the last several years. Gotta fix that.
Qbn Hunter
02-25-2003, 06:59 PM
Thanks for the help guys. I think I am going to get a couple of Fiochi Golden Pheasants. They are more expensive but I think they might be worth it.
foulshot
02-25-2003, 08:57 PM
This year I started shooting Non-Lead for pheasant and quial. I know its a bit more spensive, but I don't like cooking birds, especially the all-white meat ones, full of lead. Just kinda give me the creeps. Still working on the shot size for quial, but #6 hevishot for pheasant works fine.
Qbn Hunter
02-25-2003, 10:46 PM
Originally posted by foulshot@Feb 25 2003, 08:57 PM
This year I started shooting Non-Lead for pheasant and quial. I know its a bit more spensive, but I don't like cooking birds, especially the all-white meat ones, full of lead. Just kinda give me the creeps. Still working on the shot size for quial, but #6 hevishot for pheasant works fine.
Is that #6 for a 20 or 12 ga?
foulshot
02-27-2003, 12:23 AM
20 gauge.
SPOONY SLAYER
03-01-2003, 12:08 PM
foulshot is right. hevishot is more expensive, but you dont have to pick pellets out of the meat.... i used 20 guage 2 3/4 #6 on pheasants in montana this year. every bird that you hit is a dead bird. they are phenominal. if you can afford em, then use em....
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.7 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.